Analysts Critique Ugandan Parliament’s Failure to Learn

Summary:

• Political analysts are disappointed with Ugandan parliamentarians for not learning from their counterparts, as highlighted during the Speaker’s conference in Uganda. Analysts criticize the lack of reform in electoral processes, parliamentary discussions, and overall governance in the country. Concerns are raised about the absence of an independent parliament and external interference in decision-making.

---

Political analysts are expressing dissatisfaction with the failure of parliamentarians to draw lessons from their counterparts in other regions. This sentiment arises as a contemplation of potential insights from the ongoing Speaker’s conference in Uganda takes place.

During a discussion on NBS television this morning, political analyst Baker Batte remarked, “Our legislators and ministers embark on frequent trips, yet glean nothing from these experiences. Despite the numerous conferences held in Uganda, they seem impervious to learning.”

The analysts argue that Uganda requires several reforms, encompassing electoral processes, parliamentary discussions, and overall conflict resolution mechanisms. Their frustration stems from the perceived absence of an independent parliament, with concerns about external interference even if reforms were implemented.

Jonathan Ebwalu, a member of parliament from Sority City West, emphasized the need for reforms, particularly in electoral procedures, stating, “We need a series of reforms in this country. The sluggish pace in discussing electoral reforms indicates that parliament cannot attain true independence without these changes.”

The Commonwealth speakers’ conference addresses a range of topics, including security and climate issues. Derrick Wandera, a political journalist, expressed optimism, saying, “I hope that discussions at both local and international levels, especially concerning climate, will transpire after this speakers’ conference.”

The overarching goal of the conference is to uphold impartiality and fairness among Speakers and Presiding Officers of Parliaments, promote understanding of parliamentary democracy, and contribute to the development of parliamentary institutions.