Defiant Ruto Vows To Sack Corrupt Kenyan Judges

Summary:

• President Ruto stands firm against calls for an apology, reiterating his commitment to combating judicial corruption despite criticism from legal figures, while opposition leaders and the Law Society of Kenya express concern over threats to the constitution.

President William Ruto remains steadfast amid calls for an apology following his previous remarks targeting the Judiciary. In a recent social media post, the President affirms his dedication to eradicating corruption within the judicial system, brushing aside warnings from Senior Counsel Ahmednasir Abdullahi and Paul Muite.

Addressing Ahmednasir SC, President Ruto acknowledges the concern about sabotage by corrupt judicial officers but asserts his belief in the existence of many honorable individuals within the judiciary. He declares his commitment to rooting out corruption and dismisses any possibility of allowing bribery to impede Kenya’s transformation under his leadership.

President Ruto reiterates his position that corrupt officials in the country will be left with three choices: facing legal consequences, leaving the country, or seeking redemption in heaven. He emphasizes that no funds will be allocated for bribery, stating, “The fate of all corrupt individuals remains as I stated.”

In response to criticism from the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) President Eric Theuri, who urged an apology or warned of potential protests, President Ruto remains unyielding. The LSK emphasizes the changing dynamics where the judiciary no longer takes a subservient role to the executive branch.

Chief Justice Martha Koome issues a statement underscoring the importance of respecting the independence of the Judiciary. The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) reassures Kenyans that any allegations of misconduct or corruption against judges or judicial officers will be promptly and firmly addressed in accordance with the constitution.

Opposition leader Raila Odinga and Wiper Democratic Party leader Kalonzo Musyoka join the criticism, expressing concern about the President’s threats to the constitution he swore to protect when assuming office.